BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Käte Hamburger Kolleg: Cultures of Research (c:o/re) - ECPv6.16.5.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Käte Hamburger Kolleg: Cultures of Research (c:o/re)
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Käte Hamburger Kolleg: Cultures of Research (c:o/re)
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260706
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20260711
DTSTAMP:20260304T095155Z
CREATED:20260304T095155Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260304T095155Z
UID:16060-1783296000-1783727999@khk.rwth-aachen.de
SUMMARY:Summer School: The impacts of digitalization on science and society in the quest for more sustainable futures
DESCRIPTION:The PRAXIS research group at the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU\, the Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS\, KIT Karlsruhe) and the KHK c:o/re at RWTH Aachen University will host an International Summer School for PhD students\, titled “The impacts of digitalization on science and society in the quest for more sustainable futures”\, from July 6-10\, 2026\, in Donostia-San Sebastián. \nThe transformative effects of the digitalization of science are evident at various levels\, but its interactions with\, and future impacts on\, the broader socio-cultural transformations of science and society remain largely unknown and call for further research. Accordingly\, the Summer School will focus on the following key topics: \n\nTransformations in scientific knowledge production through digitalization\nTransformations of scientific cultures in everyday practices\nTransformations of science–society interactions in transdisciplinary and transformative research through real-world experiments using digital twins\nConcepts and methodologies for the assessment and governance of digital transformation activities\nVarieties of knowledge production and their transformation through digitalization worldwide\n\nKeynote lecturers of the Summer School will be Prof. Dr. Gabriele Gramelsberger\, KHK c:o/re\, c:o/re Fellow Prof. Dr. Harro van Lente\, full professor of Science and Technology Studies at the Faculty of Arts and Social Science\, Maastricht University\, and Prof. Dr. Stefano Balbi\, Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3) and IKERBASQUE – Basque Foundation for Science\, Basque Country. \nThe Summer School invites PhD-researchers worldwide from a broad range of Humanities\, Social Studies and Cultural Studies\, Science & Technology Studies (STS) and Technology Assessment (TA) and other inter- and transdisciplinary approaches such as policy-\, sustainability-\, and transformative-research\, which address the interrelations of digitalization of science and socio-cultural transformations.
URL:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/event/summer-school-the-impacts-of-digitalization-on-science-and-society-in-the-quest-for-more-sustainable-futures/
CATEGORIES:Summer School
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Header-pastellgelb-1280.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260722T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260722T183000
DTSTAMP:20260702T113058Z
CREATED:20260318T104418Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260702T113058Z
UID:16143-1784739600-1784745000@khk.rwth-aachen.de
SUMMARY:Artificial Intelligence as Cultural Technique: Do Chatbots Understand What They Communicate — Almost Perfectly? - Sybille Krämer (Leuphana University of Lüneburg)
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:\n \nGenerative digital media—particularly those that produce text—create the impression of a dialogue between humans and machines. The more perfect the communicative interaction—which is often epistemically useful—becomes\, the more it triggers anthropomorphic notions. This lecture develops a non-anthropomorphic interpretation of artificial intelligence by conceptualizing it as a cultural technique. A cultural technique\, however\, that not only changes the foundations of work and communication but also transforms basic scientific practices (“scholarly primitives”)\, comparable to the upheavals associated with the invention of the printing press. \nThe methodological starting point is the premise of a genuine technical nature of human being as practice. The central argument of analyzing the transition from alphanumeric to digital literacy is the “written” character of token-statistical operations in the context of the use of large language models. This “written” nature determines\, on the one hand\, the continuity of the digital—which must be understood independently of the computer—and\, on the other hand\, the radical\, disruptive novelty associated with the normalization of artificial intelligence use. \nThis event is part of our summer term 2026 Lecture Series Digital Complexity: Beyond Human Understanding. \nIf you would like to attend\, please register with events@khk.rwth-aachen.de.
URL:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/event/artificial-intelligence-as-cultural-technique-do-chatbots-understand-what-they-communicate-sybille-kramer-leuphana-university-of-luneburg/
LOCATION:Stadtpalais/Online\, Theaterstraße 75\, Aachen\, 52062\, Germany
CATEGORIES:Lecture Series 2026
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Header-LS-SoSe26.png
ORGANIZER;CN="c%3Ao/re":MAILTO:events@khk.rwth-aachen.de
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260723T143000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260723T160000
DTSTAMP:20260706T083307Z
CREATED:20260706T083307Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260706T083307Z
UID:16556-1784817000-1784822400@khk.rwth-aachen.de
SUMMARY:Imaginationskraft\, Literalität und das fragende Humanum im KI-Zeitalter: Empirische Befunde und bildungsphilosophische Resilienzstrategien am Fallbeispiel Südkorea - Chun-Shik Kim
DESCRIPTION:The talk will be held by Chun-Shik Kim\, former RWTH Kármán-Fellow at c:o/re\, in German. \nAbstract: \n\n Einleitung und problemgeschichtlicher Kontext\n\nDie zeitgenössische Transformation der globalen Wissensgesellschaft durch die rasante Durchdringung mit generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) stellt keine bloße technologische Evolution dar\, sondern eine fundamentale anthropologische Zäsur. In einer Epoche\, in der algorithmische Systeme zunehmend kognitive\, kreative und diskursive Vorrechte des Menschen präemptieren – vom autonomen Verfassen akademischer Texte bis hin zur automatisierten Synthese ästhetischer Artefakte –\, gerät das traditionelle Selbstverständnis des Homo sapiens als singuläres denkendes Subjekt in eine existenzielle Krise. Vor diesem Hintergrund fungiert Südkorea\, als eine der am stärksten digitalisierten und technologisch am weitesten fortgeschrittenen Gesellschaften der Gegenwart\, als ein globales\, empirisch hochgradig relevantes „Frühwarnsystem“. Die dort sichtbaren Entwicklungen erlauben es\, die tiefgreifenden Konsequenzen der KI-Revolution und des ubiquitären Konsums algorithmisch optimierter Kurzinhalte auf die menschliche Kognition\, die psychische Vulnerabilität und die Mechanismen der sozialen Kohäsion ex ante zu analysieren. \n\n Die Krise der Literalität und der kognitive Verfall im Spiegel digitaler Monokulturen\n\nEin zentraler Fokus des Vortrags liegt auf der kritischen Dekonstruktion der aktuellen Krise der menschlichen Lesekompetenz (Literalität). Empirische Befunde aus der südkoreanischen Bildungslandschaft der letzten Jahre zeichnen ein alarmierendes Bild: Über alle Altersgruppen hinweg ist ein signifikanter Rückgang der Fähigkeit zum tiefen\, linearen und hermeneutischen Lesen zu verzeichnen. Diese Entwicklung korreliert kausal mit der Etablierung einer digitalen Aufmerksamkeitsökonomie\, die primär auf die Rezeption algorithmisch gesteuerter Kurzvideoformate (sog. „Shorts“\, „Reels“ oder „TikTok-Feeds“) ausgerichtet ist. Kognitionswissenschaftlich und neurobiologisch lässt sich zeigen\, dass dieser permanente\, fragmentierte Reizstrom das menschliche Gehirn auf ein rein diskontinuierliches\, reaktives Rezipieren konditioniert. Die synaptische Fähigkeit\, komplexe\, textbasierte Argumentationsketten gedanklich zu durchdringen\, logische Inkonsistenzen zu identifizieren und eigenständige Abstraktionsleistungen zu erbringen\, wird dadurch systematisch atrophiert. Im interkulturellen Vergleich mit europäischen\, insbesondere deutschen Bildungs- und PISA-Daten wird deutlich\, dass es sich hierbei nicht um ein isoliertes ostasiatisches Phänomen handelt\, sondern um eine universelle Pathologie der digitalen Moderne. \n\n Psychopathologische Implikationen und die Krise der psychischen Vulnerabilität\n\nParallel zum kognitiven Abbau manifestiert sich in Südkorea eine soziopsychiatrische Krise von beispiellosem Ausmaß. Seit dem Jahr 2020 ist eine dramatische Zunahme psychischer Erkrankungen\, insbesondere unter Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen\, zu beobachten. Die Fallzahlen und Beratungsanfragen an schulischen und akademischen psychologischen Diensten verzeichnen innerhalb eines Fünfjahreszeitraums einen Anstieg von über 40 Prozent. Phänomene wie extreme soziale Isolation\, pathologische Angststörungen und chronisch-depressive Episoden weisen eine statistisch signifikante Korrelation mit exzessivem\, dysfunktionalem Smartphone- und KI-Konsum auf. Der Vortrag bettet diese Befunde in einen sozialpsychiatrischen Kontext ein und argumentiert\, dass die Entfremdung von der physischen Realität und die Substitution genuiner interpersoneller Interaktionen durch algorithmische Feedbackschleifen die psychische Resilienz des modernen Subjekts systematisch untergraben. Diese epidemiologische Entwicklung liefert drängende Impulse für eine transnationale präventive Bildungs- und Gesundheitspolitik. \n\n Synästhetische Atrophie und das Paradoxon der „freiwilligen Domestizierung“\n\nAuf einer tieferen philosophischen und anthropologischen Ebene führt die permanente digitale Reizüberflutung zu dem\, was als synästhetischer Verfall bezeichnet werden muss – dem Verlust der Fähigkeit\, diverse Sinnesmodalitäten kreativ\, emotional und hermeneutisch miteinander zu verknüpfen. In theoretischer Anlehnung an Peter Sloterdijks Konzepte der anthropotechnischen Selbstformung sowie an das evolutionär-soziologische Theorem der „domestication by choice“ (der freiwilligen Verhaltensvereinfachung und kognitiven Selbstunterwerfung unter technologische Entlastungsarchive) analysiert der Vortrag die Dialektik der digitalen Befreiung. Indem der Mensch fundamentale kognitive Prozesse an KI-Systeme delegiert\, entzieht er seinen eigenen geistigen Vermögen den notwendigen Widerstand. Die Folge ist eine paradoxe Verengung des sensorischen\, imaginativen und kognitiven Repertoires. Das Staunen\, das spekulatieve Erfinden und das genuine Fragen – als Kernmerkmale des Humanum – drohen in einer technologisch kuratierten Passivität zu erlöschen. \n\n Bildungsphilosophische Gegenstrategien: Die Stärkung des „Gedankenmuskels“\n\nGegen diese dystopischen Tendenzen artikuliert der Vortrag eine dezidiert konstruktive\, bildungsphilosophische Gegenposition. Im Zentrum steht hierbei die theoretische Fundierung des in der koreanischen Reformdiskussion geprägten Begriffs des „Gedankenmuskels“ (Mind Muscle). Dieses Konzept zielt auf die systematische\, curative Rekultivierung der kognitiven Resilienz\, der imaginativen Kapazität und der sprachlichen Souveränität des Subjekts. Historisch-philosophisch inspiriert wird dieser Ansatz durch das Vermächtnis des späteren südkoreanischen Präsidenten und Friedensnobelpreisträgers Kim Dae-jung (1925–2009). Dieser hatte während seiner politischen Hafthaft unter akuter Todesgefahr in seinen berühmten Gefängnisbriefen ein humanistisches Bildungsmanifest formuliert\, das die „geistige Erhebung des Menschen“ und die unbedingte Bewahrung der inneren Freiheit als ultimatives Ziel jeglicher Pädagogik proklamierte. \nDer Vortrag plädiert abschließend für eine transnationale Renaissance des fragenden\, selbstdenkenden Subjekts. Nur durch eine bildungspolitische und philosophische Neuausrichtung\, welche die Ausbildung tiefer Literalität und die Stärkung des kognitiven Widerstandes gegen die algorithmische Sedierung priorisiert\, kann die internationale Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft der Gefahr einer technologisch induzierten Selbstdomestizierung des Menschen wirksam begegnen.
URL:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/event/imaginationskraft-literalitat-und-das-fragende-humanum-im-ki-zeitalter-empirische-befunde-und-bildungsphilosophische-resilienzstrategien-am-fallbeispiel-sudkorea-chun-shik-kim/
LOCATION:Stadtpalais\, Theaterstraße 75\, Aachen\, 52062\, Germany
CATEGORIES:Talks
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Header-grun-grau-1280.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261104T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261105T170000
DTSTAMP:20260205T081236Z
CREATED:20260205T081229Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260205T081236Z
UID:15900-1793779200-1793898000@khk.rwth-aachen.de
SUMMARY:Freedom of Research: A European Summit
DESCRIPTION:For more information about the program\, check out the event website. \nThe Summit is organized by the Charlemagne Prize Foundation and RWTH Aachen University’s Knowledge Hub and Käte Hamburger Kolleg: Cultures of Research (c:o/re).
URL:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/event/freedom-of-research-a-european-summit/
CATEGORIES:Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Plakat-FoR-Header-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20261109
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20261114
DTSTAMP:20260630T122927Z
CREATED:20260630T122602Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260630T122927Z
UID:16526-1794182400-1794614399@khk.rwth-aachen.de
SUMMARY:Winter School: Varieties of Science and Technology in Europe: Shifting Fortunes of STS in Turbulent Times
DESCRIPTION:This year’s Gesellschaft für Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung e.V. (GWTF) conference is preceded by a Winter School and organized in cooperation with RWTH Aachen University’s KHK c:o/re and its current thematic focus on “Globality and Varieties of Science.” We therefore expressly invite members of national STS associations in Europe to discuss this topic with us. \nScience and Technology Studies (STS) currently find themselves in a precarious position: Epistemologically\, they are caught between multiple disciplines precisely because they have become highly specialized. Institutionally\, as a relatively small field\, this position is often weak. At the same time\, STS are increasingly called upon to contribute to innovation and transformation processes originating in other disciplines\, such as biosciences or engineering. This is less surprising than it appears at first glance\, for science and technology themselves confront a range of tensions. On the one hand\, STS are mobilized to address societal problems and increasingly help to play a prominent role in processes of collective problem-solving. Key terms here include transdisciplinary research\, mission-oriented research\, co-creation\, and responsible research and innovation. On the other hand\, science and technology face increasing attacks and challenges. Growing restrictions of academic freedom in many countries are evident in the Academic Freedom Index. In addition\, universities have become battlegrounds for right-wing culture wars\, in which slogans like “cancel culture” are used to stir up sentiment against those deemed undesirable. In this situation\, research into the social and cultural dimensions of science and technology is growing in significance. Under these conditions\, and in playing an integrated role for science and technology\, STS must navigate more actively the tension between engagement and distancing. \nIn this context\, we want to take a closer look at the question of the positioning of Science and Technology Studies against the backdrop of different circumstances in European countries. We want to learn about specific cultural and institutional embeddings of STS and also focus on developments where these embeddings are particularly salient. We suggest the following two thematic strands as exemplary cases: \n\nForms of hybrid knowledge production and technology development in different European countries. It is truly astonishing how diverse the variants of transdisciplinary research have become under various labels (be it transdisciplinary research\, citizen science\, real-world laboratories\, etc.). Modes of funding and innovation policy have provided stimulating impe-tuses for how specific academic systems and forms of civil society organization interact. How have these forms of transdisciplinary research developed and which variations can be ob-served? And what is the relationship between such variations and their respective cultural-institutional contexts? What self-conceptions of researchers have developed? What does the balance between engagement and distancing look like\, how did it develop\, and how is it per-formed? For example\, the conditions and limitations of academic freedom differ from country to country. Europe\, too\, is not free from authoritarian developments\, which assigns science and technology research a significant yet precarious sociopolitical role in preserving academic freedom through its continued advancement.\nAcademic careers (in STS) in different countries. Academic systems can be understood in terms of their form and orientation particularly through the academic careers that emerge within them—or fail to emerge. The conditions of socialization of aspiring researchers reflect the particular cultural and institutional characteristics of a scientific system. What career paths are typically institutionally predefined? What meritocratic signals must scientists in their early career paths demonstrate to accumulate the symbolic capital that is so crucial? Even if the prevailing impression is that these are measured by the respective disciplines using purely objective criteria (such as\, publication and external funding success)\, a closer look is warranted here. What experiences and career paths exist in the various European countries? What key factors influence the similarity or dissimilarity of such career paths? And what is the situation in particularly specialized fields such as STS\, where it can be assumed that career trajectories within the academic system—which are already highly complex—develop in even more intricate ways? In addition to disciplinary quality indicators\, researchers often face other requirements that they must fulfill\, which presents a significant problem in the academic careers of researchers in STS\, as academic careers have traditionally been determined by discipline—that is\, by a qualification in a specific academic field. Cross-disciplinary perspectives are often critical in this regard. However: how does this relate to the different fields of application and the disciplines involved? What differences emerge depending on funding formats?\n\nOn the first evening of the conference\, a panel discussion on the European dimension from the perspective of the individual professional associations is to take place. \nMore information will follow soon!
URL:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/event/winter-school-varieties-of-science-and-technology-in-europe-shifting-fortunes-of-sts-in-turbulent-times/
LOCATION:Stadtpalais\, Theaterstraße 75\, Aachen\, 52062\, Germany
CATEGORIES:Winter School
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Header-petrolblau-1280.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20261112
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20261114
DTSTAMP:20260630T122949Z
CREATED:20260630T122826Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260630T122949Z
UID:16529-1794441600-1794614399@khk.rwth-aachen.de
SUMMARY:Conference: Varieties of Science and Technology in Europe: Shifting Fortunes of STS in Turbulent Times
DESCRIPTION:This year’s Gesellschaft für Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung e.V. (GWTF) conference is organized in cooperation with RWTH Aachen University’s Käte Hamburger Kolleg: Cultures of Research (c:o/re) and its current thematic focus on “Globality and Varieties of Science.” We therefore expressly invite members of national STS associations in Europe to discuss this topic with us. \nScience and Technology Studies (STS) currently find themselves in a precarious position: Epistemologically\, they are caught between multiple disciplines precisely because they have become highly specialized. Institutionally\, as a relatively small field\, this position is often weak. At the same time\, STS are increasingly called upon to contribute to innovation and transformation processes originating in other disciplines\, such as biosciences or engineering. This is less surprising than it appears at first glance\, for science and technology themselves confront a range of tensions. On the one hand\, STS are mobilized to address societal problems and increasingly help to play a prominent role in processes of collective problem-solving. Key terms here include transdisciplinary research\, mission-oriented research\, co-creation\, and responsible research and innovation. On the other hand\, science and technology face increasing attacks and challenges. Growing restrictions of academic freedom in many countries are evident in the Academic Freedom Index. In addition\, universities have become battlegrounds for right-wing culture wars\, in which slogans like “cancel culture” are used to stir up sentiment against those deemed undesirable. In this situation\, research into the social and cultural dimensions of science and technology is growing in significance. Under these conditions\, and in playing an integrated role for science and technology\, STS must navigate more actively the tension between engagement and distancing. \nIn this context\, we want to take a closer look at the question of the positioning of Science and Technology Studies against the backdrop of different circumstances in European countries. We want to learn about specific cultural and institutional embeddings of STS and also focus on developments where these embeddings are particularly salient. We suggest the following two thematic strands as exemplary cases: \n\nForms of hybrid knowledge production and technology development in different European countries. It is truly astonishing how diverse the variants of transdisciplinary research have become under various labels (be it transdisciplinary research\, citizen science\, real-world laboratories\, etc.). Modes of funding and innovation policy have provided stimulating impe-tuses for how specific academic systems and forms of civil society organization interact. How have these forms of transdisciplinary research developed and which variations can be ob-served? And what is the relationship between such variations and their respective cultural-institutional contexts? What self-conceptions of researchers have developed? What does the balance between engagement and distancing look like\, how did it develop\, and how is it per-formed? For example\, the conditions and limitations of academic freedom differ from country to country. Europe\, too\, is not free from authoritarian developments\, which assigns science and technology research a significant yet precarious sociopolitical role in preserving academic freedom through its continued advancement.\nAcademic careers (in STS) in different countries. Academic systems can be understood in terms of their form and orientation particularly through the academic careers that emerge within them—or fail to emerge. The conditions of socialization of aspiring researchers reflect the particular cultural and institutional characteristics of a scientific system. What career paths are typically institutionally predefined? What meritocratic signals must scientists in their early career paths demonstrate to accumulate the symbolic capital that is so crucial? Even if the prevailing impression is that these are measured by the respective disciplines using purely objective criteria (such as\, publication and external funding success)\, a closer look is warranted here. What experiences and career paths exist in the various European countries? What key factors influence the similarity or dissimilarity of such career paths? And what is the situation in particularly specialized fields such as STS\, where it can be assumed that career trajectories within the academic system—which are already highly complex—develop in even more intricate ways? In addition to disciplinary quality indicators\, researchers often face other requirements that they must fulfill\, which presents a significant problem in the academic careers of researchers in STS\, as academic careers have traditionally been determined by discipline—that is\, by a qualification in a specific academic field. Cross-disciplinary perspectives are often critical in this regard. However: how does this relate to the different fields of application and the disciplines involved? What differences emerge depending on funding formats?
URL:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/event/conference-varieties-of-science-and-technology-in-europe-shifting-fortunes-of-sts-in-turbulent-times/
LOCATION:Forum M\, Mayersche\, Buchkremerstraße 1-7\, Aachen\, 52062\, Germany
CATEGORIES:Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://khk.rwth-aachen.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Header-petrolblau-1280.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR